Antitrust Law Violation Of Antitrust Laws - 1277 Words

Antitrust Law Violations Introduction This paper will discuss the Google case that was presented by Microsoft stating that Google was in violation of antitrust laws. Also, in this paper some of the pecuniary and non-pecuniary costs will be discussed. Given in this paper will also be my thoughts on monopolies and oligopolies. Antitrust Case Google was investigated for antitrust behavior because they were claimed to be an â€Å"internet bully that abuses its dominance of online search and advertising† (STEINHAUSER LIEDTKE, 2011, p. 1). Google was doing things like buying smaller companies in search results but then labeling/highlighting their own services instead. Being that Google was knocking out the competition by only showing their results†¦show more content†¦When dealing with market structures and considering Google as a monopoly, the characteristics of the monopoly market structure fit. In a sense, Google is being seen as the only producer for internet search, and is trying to make it seem through their practices that they are the only reliable business in the industry. Because of the overwhelming market power Google is gaining through the use of other smaller companies, other businesses such as Microsoft, are beginning to feel that the competition being created is unfair and favored. Especially w ith Google blocking out their results as the search engine is used. Antitrust as Investopedia pointed out, â€Å"prohibits a variety of practices that restrain trade,† (Antitrust Definition | Investopedia, n.d.). According to the complaints of Microsoft, Google was in violation of the Sherman Act of 1980. The Sherman Act states that, â€Å"public is best served by free competition in trade and industry,† (Sherman Anti-Trust Act legal definition of Sherman Anti-Trust Act, n.d.). Also, the Sherman Act points out that, â€Å"it prohibits monopolies attempts to monopolize, or conspiracies to monopolize.† (Sherman Anti-Trust Act legal definition of Sherman Anti-Trust Act, n.d). By blocking out their rivals, and not giving them an equal opportunity to display the information related to the searches of the consumers, Microsoft felt this was a violation of the Sherman Act. On another note, after reading the research

Event Critique Minnesota vs Purdue Feb. 24th 2010 Essay...

Event Critique: Minnesota vs Purdue Feb. 24th 2010 The event I attended was the Gopher Mens Basketball game against the Purdue Boilermakers on February 24 at Williams Arena (The Barn). The construction of Williams Arena was completed in 1928 and originally housed a variety of Gopher Athletics. In addition to housing the mens basketball team, as it still does today, winter football training, tennis, and track all called the facility home at one point1al University of Minnesota History of Williams Arenahttp://www.gophersports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=8400ATCLID=310102 . The main tenants of the building have changed over the years as the various teams that called Williams Arena home were built one of their own. However,†¦show more content†¦When entering the arena itself and seated the closeness of the players seems unreal due to the raised court and the upper section seats that seem to be hovering on air on top of sections below them. This provides for an excellent fan experience and a very memorable one. The seats in Wi lliams Arena are available in either bench style seating or theater style both of which are not too terribly comfortable. The latest renovations to Williams Arena include a huge update where the floorboards were changed for the very first time this year since 1928. 2 CBS Sports Article, Arena Wars http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/story/11934209 With the buildings history and its close proximity to other large buildings in the area it would be hard to do any sort of complete renovation of the site to expand on the outside but some of the interior could be possibly renovated/remodeled to make the building feel larger on the concourse level. The University Avenue entrance use to house the main ticket office, including on site sales, will call, and University pass list, as well as home and opposing team will calls, which has now been moved over to the Oak Street entrance leaving with the exception of the teams will calls a rare find in Williams Arena, an empty space. The University entrance is still the main thruway for season ticket holders,Show MoreRelated_x000C_Introduction to Statistics a nd Data Analysis355457 Words   |  1422 PagesInterpreting and Communicating the Results of Statistical Analyses 264 Activity 5.1 Exploring Correlation and Regression 267 Activity 5.2 Age and Flexibility 268 Graphing Calculator Explorations 272 6 Probability 279 6.1 Chance Experiments and Events 279 6.2 Deï ¬ nition of Probability 288 ââ€"   Contents ix 6.3 Basic Properties of Probability 295 6.4 Conditional Probability 302 6.5 Independence 313 6.6 Some General Probability Rules 323 6.7 Estimating Probabilities Empirically Using Simulation

Federalism Paper Review Free Essays

Wanna, J 2007, ‘Improving Federalism: Drivers for Change, Repair Options and Reform Scenarios’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. We will write a custom essay sample on Federalism Paper Review or any similar topic only for you Order Now 275 – 279. | Purpose The author aims to present an overview of the proceedings from a roundtable discussion on federalism. The paper aims to inform readers of the views of participants by reporting on discussion points on the subject of improving federalism, through consideration of issues and challenges and options for reform. The author contrasts the different federalism characteristics discussed. Confused and competitive interactions occur between federal, state and local government with attendant impacts on service delivery. In particular much of the dysfunction in the current system stems from uncertainty around roles and an argumentative approach to dividing resources and defining responsibility. Federalism was in long term decline and a product of changing market forces from national and international pressure and global communication reducing regional identify. Overlapping policy interaction and involvement of the tiers of government was presented as an impediment to effective delineation of roles. Federalism provided greater accountability through increased scrutiny by multiple government and review of achievements particularly in contentious areas. Participants agreed federalism would be improved by gradual change. The author discussed the idea change should focus on advancing the current situation rather than whole-scale reform through a new paradigm of strategic pragmatism. The group considered that fiscal issues drive a shift to centralism. Improving federalism requires better relations, through increased clarity of roles and responsibilities and levels of trust, possibly formalised through agreements and structural rationalisation. Evidence The paper presents findings as observations from discussions initially. The author introduces uncited references and discusses external and personal views. The discussion of participants views are not quantified specifically and references are made to ‘most’, ‘many thought’, ‘those who believed’. The origin of sources is unclear. For example ‘some commentators’ is unclear as to whether these were participants or external views. Summarised statements appeared to be discussions of the participants merged with personal opinion. | Page 275, 276 and 277. Page 276Pages 275 – 277Page 276Page 278| Observations The author initially expresses an observational account of the proceedings of the meeting in a neutral manner. This approach gradually transitions into an academic piece that draws on the author’s extensive understanding of the field and his personal views together with unreferenced discussion of academic positions. The paper is confusing at times and apparently aims to presents the outcomes and discussion points of a meeting initially but soon changes to uncited external examples, statements and personal opinion. Whilst the author references the panel’s deliberations and discussions, these are unquantified references to participant’s opinions and refer simply to ‘many’ or ‘most participants’. The author seems to have a bias toward a principled view of federalism with support for a fusion of pragmatic and principled approaches. The paper appears contradictory in parts. For example, an observation was made that there was a widely held view that roles and responsibilities needed to be specified. It was later stated that the ‘jury was still out’ on whether this was a worthwhile goal, which appeared to be a personal view rather than reporting on discussions. In concluding the author draws on a range of options for specific reform that were not introduced earlier in the paper. How to cite Federalism Paper Review, Papers

Setting vs Story Dantes Inferno and Sartres No Essay Example For Students

Setting vs Story Dantes Inferno and Sartres No Essay ExitSettingvs Story Dantes Inferno and Sartres No ExitThis essay is on setting differences usingthe works of Dantes The Inferno and Jean Paul Sartres No Exit. Adam looks about spotting all the importantpeople that will influence the rest of his life. He takes a deep breathand prepares to make this his last and final addition to life. Quietlyhe draws back from the church as if to stop time, this moment may definehim as a man. He turns to look at the priest as if to reply his answer,but suddenly he realizes the hand he is holding is as cold as death. Quicklyhe snaps back into reality recognizing he is not asking for his brideshand in marriage, but burying her. Once again his mind tricked him intothinking that he was starting all over again with a new chance; however,as in life, sometimes there are no second chances. Dantes Inferno and Jean Paul SartresNo Exit illustrate irony in setting in similar ways, such that there areno second chances in life. Both works take the readers into the minds oftheir authors where each author gives their interpretation of hell. Dantesand Jean Paul Sartres works both have similar aspects of setting thatare expressed in similar styles. Through symbolism, representation, andfinite physical details each author establishesirony, yet also reinforces his theme. When Dante wrote The Inferno his mind thrived on the different levels ofinterpretation; likewise, Jean Paul Sartres mind thrived on this, andhe patterned No Exit after Dantes work. The symbolism expressed in Dantes Infernocorrelates directly, in some cases, to the play written by Jean Paul Sartre,No Exit. Symbolism in both works cannot be defined by one level of thinkingand neither can it be comprehended on one level. However, symbolism inrelation to the setting of both works exhibits the nature of both writersto be very ironic in some cases. For example, throughout Dantes Inferno,Dante makes many direct references to the light and the heavens: Therefore,if you win through this gloomy pass and climb again to see the heaven ofstars when it rejoices to you . . . (p. 145, l. 82 -5).These references,also made in No Exit, reveal the irony that none of the inhabitants ofhell can ever see the light of God or, in Jean Paul Sartres perspective,will always be reminded of the light and the choice they made: Alwaysbroad daylight in my eyes- and in my head. (p.6) is another example ofironic symbolism, the mantle, found in No Exit and the evident referencesto heaven and the true way The Inferno. Additionally, Yes, nows the moment; Imlooking at this thing on the mantlepiece, and I understand that Im inhell.(p. 45): this direct quote from the play No Exit also captivatesDantes exact meanings that while you are in hell you will constantly bereminded of thepath you chose not to take or the trueway you chose not to follow. Finally the last illustration of symbolismin No Exit is the mirror and in Dantes Inferno the creatures of hell. The mirror, or the lack of, reveals the characters weaknesses towardsthemselves. The character of Estelle had six mirrors in her lifetime andnow is sentenced in hell never to see herself again. While for the othercharacters, Inez and Gracin, the lack of mirrors represents something else. .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 , .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 .postImageUrl , .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 , .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52:hover , .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52:visited , .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52:active { border:0!important; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52:active , .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52 .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u932f9bc5aacfe40909737e0e01f52b52:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Subject = Shakespeare EssayFor Gracin he sees mirrors everywhere, and this shows the torture he goesthrough in hell, being constantly reminded of his sins. On the other hand,for Inez her mirror is seeing Estelle, her object of desire, and Gracintogether forever, while also being constantly reminded of the sin, lust,she committed on earth. Dantes work is much morerepresentative, and his creatures of helldisclose their symbolism in the guarding of the different circles of hell. For example the Minotaur, once a great beast who guarded many, is now guardianof circle seven and will forever be reminded of his sins on earth due tothe fact his is the guardian of those who can never escape and his presenceis a struggle of unending hell. The sins of hell in The Inferno and NoExit both exemplify the notion thatthe sin you committed on earth is alsothe punishment you shall receive in hell. This notion is the basis of theirony, that what you could not live without on earth is the